Let me just state that my note should have said: "I believe that this
was introduced ...".
I really can't provide a definitive answer if it was in an earlier
version. Is there a reason you can't simply use an external C routine to
do the conversion, or does the 1.x series not have 64-bit types? (FWIW,
the 1.x didn't have features I needed, so I used the early 2.x series. I
eventually dropped SE support altogether after the split in the compiler
camps over ECMA. Shame too, 'cause the SE generated code was
significantly faster in my application).
Mark
Colin Adams wrote:
>> From: "Mark A. Bolstad" <mbo...@ar...>
>
>>> This appears to be a problem - ISE has truncated_to_integer64,
>>> >> but SE doesn't. Is there a way round this?
>>>
>>> Eric> I don't know. Does SE provide some other means to achieve
>>> Eric> that?
>>>
>>> I can't find one. Does anyone else know?
>>>
>> There is a "force_to_integer_64" feature in REAL_64. This was
>> introduced in the early 2 series.
>
> Then I guess that is evidence that there is no such feature in 1.1,
> and therefore 1.2 also.
> So I have a major problem.
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
>> Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
>> Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
>> Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
>
>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gobo-eiffel-develop mailing list
>> gob...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gobo-eiffel-develop
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> The next generation of Hotmail is here! http://www.newhotmail.co.uk
>
|
