Menu
▾
▴
gobo-eiffel-develop
|
From: Colin A. <col...@ho...> - 2007-05-10 10:06:51
|
Can we start using this? I want to enter the four long-standing bugs I have previously reported in the XML parser. _________________________________________________________________ Play your part in making history - Email Britain! http://www.emailbritain.co.uk/ |
|
From: Eric B. <er...@go...> - 2007-05-10 11:46:49
|
Colin Adams wrote: > Can we start using this? > > I want to enter the four long-standing bugs I have previously reported in > the XML parser. Back in January I wrote: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ *) Bug tracker: As the Gobo project is growing, the mailing list is not enough anymore to track bugs, feature requests and development status. It has been asked that we use the facilities provided in SourceForge. I agree with that. But first we need to agree on a set of Categories and Groups in order to keep the bug tracker organized. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I received no suggestions yet for Categories and Groups to be used in the bug tracker. -- Eric Bezault mailto:er...@go... http://www.gobosoft.com |
|
From: Bernd S. <ber...@in...> - 2007-05-10 12:35:40
|
At Thu, 10 May 2007 13:43:25 +0200, Eric Bezault wrote: > As the Gobo project is growing, the mailing list is not > enough anymore to track bugs, feature requests and > development status. It has been asked that we use the > facilities provided in SourceForge. I agree with that. > But first we need to agree on a set of Categories and > Groups in order to keep the bug tracker organized. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > I received no suggestions yet for Categories and > Groups to be used in the bug tracker. Ok, let me try: - For "Group", we go for "Trunk" and version numbers of the releases as available unter 'tag'. - For "Category", we go for the different subfolders under "library" and unter "src". Also, we might add "Other" Tool.geant Tool.gec Tool.gelex Tool.gelint Tool.gepp Tool.getest Tool.gexace Tool.gexslt Tool.geyacc Lib.argument Lib.kernel Lib.lexical Lib.math Lib.parse Lib.pattern Lib.regexp Lib.string Lib.structure Lib.test Lib.time Lib.tools Lib.utility Lib.xml Other It is a little bit lengthy, but I think easy to understand. Bernd |
|
From: Eric B. <er...@go...> - 2007-05-10 13:10:28
|
Bernd Schoeller wrote: > At Thu, 10 May 2007 13:43:25 +0200, Eric Bezault wrote: >> I received no suggestions yet for Categories and >> Groups to be used in the bug tracker. > > Ok, let me try: > > - For "Group", we go for "Trunk" and version numbers of the releases > as available unter 'tag'. > > - For "Category", we go for the different subfolders under "library" > and unter "src". Also, we might add "Other" > > Tool.geant > Tool.gec > Tool.gelex > Tool.gelint > Tool.gepp > Tool.getest > Tool.gexace > Tool.gexslt > Tool.geyacc > > Lib.argument > Lib.kernel > Lib.lexical > Lib.math > Lib.parse > Lib.pattern > Lib.regexp > Lib.string > Lib.structure > Lib.test > Lib.time > Lib.tools > Lib.utility > Lib.xml > > Other Considering that all tools start with "ge" and no library starts with "ge", perhaps we can get rid of the prefixes "Tool." and "Lib."? -- Eric Bezault mailto:er...@go... http://www.gobosoft.com |
|
From: Colin A. <col...@ho...> - 2007-05-10 16:08:03
|
>From: Eric Bezault <er...@go...> >Bernd Schoeller wrote: > > At Thu, 10 May 2007 13:43:25 +0200, Eric Bezault wrote: > >> I received no suggestions yet for Categories and > >> Groups to be used in the bug tracker. > > > > Ok, let me try: > > > > - For "Group", we go for "Trunk" and version numbers of the releases > > as available unter 'tag'. > > > > - For "Category", we go for the different subfolders under "library" > > and unter "src". Also, we might add "Other" > > > > Tool.geant > > Tool.gec > > Tool.gelex > > Tool.gelint > > Tool.gepp > > Tool.getest > > Tool.gexace > > Tool.gexslt > > Tool.geyacc > > > > Lib.argument > > Lib.kernel > > Lib.lexical > > Lib.math > > Lib.parse > > Lib.pattern > > Lib.regexp > > Lib.string > > Lib.structure > > Lib.test > > Lib.time > > Lib.tools > > Lib.utility > > Lib.xml > > > > Other > >Considering that all tools start with "ge" and >no library starts with "ge", perhaps we can get >rid of the prefixes "Tool." and "Lib."? I agree - it's unecessarily ugly. _________________________________________________________________ Reserve your place in history - Email Britain! http://www.emailbritain.co.uk/ |
|
From: Bernd S. <ber...@in...> - 2007-05-10 16:38:13
|
At Thu, 10 May 2007 17:07:55 +0100, Colin Adams wrote: > >Considering that all tools start with "ge" and > >no library starts with "ge", perhaps we can get > >rid of the prefixes "Tool." and "Lib."? > > I agree - it's unecessarily ugly. Sorry for my lack of esthetics, I am German ;-) Bernd |
|
From: Colin P. A. <co...@co...> - 2007-05-12 08:51:52
|
>>>>> "Eric" == Eric Bezault <er...@go...> writes:
Eric> I did that. I was not sure whether we should just have a Bug
Eric> Tracker, or also a Feature Request Tracker. What's your
Eric> opinion?
I think yes.
And any feature requests not self-assigned by anyone after one month,
can be assigned to the requester :-)
--
Colin Adams
Preston Lancashire
|
|
From: Colin P. A. <co...@co...> - 2007-05-12 08:20:37
|
>>>>> "Bernd" == Bernd Schoeller <ber...@in...> writes:
>> I received no suggestions yet for Categories and Groups to be
>> used in the bug tracker.
Bernd> - For "Category", we go for the different subfolders under
Bernd> "library" and unter "src". Also, we might add "Other"
I would like XSLT, XPath and XPointer added as separate categories.
--
Colin Adams
Preston Lancashire
|
|
From: Eric B. <er...@go...> - 2007-05-12 08:49:14
|
Colin Paul Adams wrote: >>>>>> "Bernd" == Bernd Schoeller <ber...@in...> writes: > > >> I received no suggestions yet for Categories and Groups to be > >> used in the bug tracker. > > Bernd> - For "Category", we go for the different subfolders under > Bernd> "library" and unter "src". Also, we might add "Other" > > I would like XSLT, XPath and XPointer added as separate categories. Oops, not done yet. -- Eric Bezault mailto:er...@go... http://www.gobosoft.com |
|
From: Colin P. A. <co...@co...> - 2007-05-12 15:17:52
|
>>>>> "Eric" == Eric Bezault <er...@go...> writes:
Eric> Eric Bezault wrote:
>> Colin Paul Adams wrote:
>>>>>>>> "Bernd" == Bernd Schoeller <ber...@in...>
>>>>>>>> writes:
>>> >> I received no suggestions yet for Categories and Groups to
>>> be >> used in the bug tracker.
>>>
Bernd> - For "Category", we go for the different subfolders under
Bernd> "library" and unter "src". Also, we might add "Other"
>>> I would like XSLT, XPath and XPointer added as separate
>>> categories.
>> Oops, not done yet.
Eric> Done now.
Eric> I wonder whether it should actually be xml/xslt, xml/xpath
Eric> and xml/xpointer in order to show that they are under xml in
Eric> the library hierarchy.
I wouldn't have thought so.
In any case, one of the annoying things about the sourceforge trackers
is you can NEVER delete a category or group once you have created one.
So we are stuck with this now (it would be too confusing to have both
XSLT and xml/xslt).
--
Colin Adams
Preston Lancashire
|
|
From: Eric B. <er...@go...> - 2007-05-12 08:48:00
|
Eric Bezault wrote: > Bernd Schoeller wrote: >> At Thu, 10 May 2007 13:43:25 +0200, Eric Bezault wrote: >>> I received no suggestions yet for Categories and >>> Groups to be used in the bug tracker. >> Ok, let me try: >> >> - For "Group", we go for "Trunk" and version numbers of the releases >> as available unter 'tag'. >> >> - For "Category", we go for the different subfolders under "library" >> and unter "src". Also, we might add "Other" >> >> Tool.geant >> Tool.gec >> Tool.gelex >> Tool.gelint >> Tool.gepp >> Tool.getest >> Tool.gexace >> Tool.gexslt >> Tool.geyacc >> >> Lib.argument >> Lib.kernel >> Lib.lexical >> Lib.math >> Lib.parse >> Lib.pattern >> Lib.regexp >> Lib.string >> Lib.structure >> Lib.test >> Lib.time >> Lib.tools >> Lib.utility >> Lib.xml >> >> Other > > Considering that all tools start with "ge" and > no library starts with "ge", perhaps we can get > rid of the prefixes "Tool." and "Lib."? I did that. I was not sure whether we should just have a Bug Tracker, or also a Feature Request Tracker. What's your opinion? -- Eric Bezault mailto:er...@go... http://www.gobosoft.com |
|
From: Eric B. <er...@go...> - 2007-05-12 08:52:57
|
Eric Bezault wrote: > Colin Paul Adams wrote: >>>>>>> "Bernd" == Bernd Schoeller <ber...@in...> writes: >> >> I received no suggestions yet for Categories and Groups to be >> >> used in the bug tracker. >> >> Bernd> - For "Category", we go for the different subfolders under >> Bernd> "library" and unter "src". Also, we might add "Other" >> >> I would like XSLT, XPath and XPointer added as separate categories. > > Oops, not done yet. Done now. I wonder whether it should actually be xml/xslt, xml/xpath and xml/xpointer in order to show that they are under xml in the library hierarchy. -- Eric Bezault mailto:er...@go... http://www.gobosoft.com |
|
From: Eric B. <er...@go...> - 2007-05-12 08:56:00
|
Colin Paul Adams wrote: >>>>>> "Eric" == Eric Bezault <er...@go...> writes: > > Eric> I did that. I was not sure whether we should just have a Bug > Eric> Tracker, or also a Feature Request Tracker. What's your > Eric> opinion? > > I think yes. > > And any feature requests not self-assigned by anyone after one month, > can be assigned to the requester :-) Unfortunately I don't see an option to do that automatically. -- Eric Bezault mailto:er...@go... http://www.gobosoft.com |
|
From: Colin P. A. <co...@co...> - 2007-05-12 15:08:24
|
>>>>> "Eric" == Eric Bezault <er...@go...> writes:
Eric> Colin Paul Adams wrote:
>>>>>>> "Eric" == Eric Bezault <er...@go...> writes:
Eric> I did that. I was not sure whether we should just have a
>> Bug
Eric> Tracker, or also a Feature Request Tracker. What's your
Eric> opinion?
>> I think yes. And any feature requests not self-assigned by
>> anyone after one month, can be assigned to the requester :-)
Eric> Unfortunately I don't see an option to do that
Eric> automatically.
I was only joking.
We can only assign to people with a sourceforge id which is a
developer for the project, I think.
--
Colin Adams
Preston Lancashire
|
|
From: Eric B. <er...@go...> - 2007-05-12 15:27:57
|
Colin Paul Adams wrote: > In any case, one of the annoying things about the sourceforge trackers > is you can NEVER delete a category or group once you have created one. > > So we are stuck with this now (it would be too confusing to have both > XSLT and xml/xslt). We cannot delete, but we can rename (that's why I created them before waiting for your answer). So it is still possible to rename xslt as xml/xslt. -- Eric Bezault mailto:er...@go... http://www.gobosoft.com |
|
From: Colin P. A. <co...@co...> - 2007-05-12 15:44:53
|
>>>>> "Eric" == Eric Bezault <er...@go...> writes:
Eric> Colin Paul Adams wrote:
>> In any case, one of the annoying things about the sourceforge
>> trackers is you can NEVER delete a category or group once you
>> have created one. So we are stuck with this now (it would be
>> too confusing to have both XSLT and xml/xslt).
Eric> We cannot delete, but we can rename (that's why I created
Eric> them before waiting for your answer). So it is still
Eric> possible to rename xslt as xml/xslt.
I wish I had known that long ago! I made a complete mess of the
gestalt bug-tracker classifications.
I think xml/xslt is unnecessarily complicated.
--
Colin Adams
Preston Lancashire
|
×
Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI?
Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X