Strange syntax... Please add a quote of their docs mentioning this.
And yes: you're free to implement it if MF supports it (the "bad" thing here [it is not that bad and we should have more of these]: to be "correct" we'd need a compiler configuration for this).
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Omitting the NUMBER phrase results in a default value of PLUS 1.
Attached is a patch for this feature. Quite a large chunk of the screen description code had to be re-arranged to avoid a reduce/reduce error involving the GLOBAL clause. Do you think it's acceptable?
Strange syntax... Please add a quote of their docs mentioning this.
And yes: you're free to implement it if MF supports it (the "bad" thing here [it is not that bad and we should have more of these]: to be "correct" we'd need a compiler configuration for this).
For the
COLUMN
clause:For the
LINE
clause:Attached is a patch for this feature. Quite a large chunk of the screen description code had to be re-arranged to avoid a reduce/reduce error involving the
GLOBAL
clause. Do you think it's acceptable?I think we find a better way. Can you please commit the parts that aren't part of this issue already?
I'm thinking about:
_symbolic_collection
->symbolic_collection
; do we need theSHIFT_PREFER
there, btw?screen_col_number
andscreen_line_number
PENDING
global_screen_opt
->screen_global_clause
Sure; done in [r1501].
This got somehow lost - @edward-h please send an updated patch towards current SVN and/or de-assign yourself.