#61 Broken project, added extra stuff

Next release
closed-out-of-date
None
9
2013-11-13
2013-10-31
No

1) The update from 1.1.2.201310221203 to 1.1.4.201310301732 broke my project - the Directories option. With the 1.1.4 the content is lost.

2) The generated command-line creates additional output for the arm-none-eabig-gcc compiler. The Cross ARM C Compiler shows me in the field "All options"

-DPROCESSOR=NXP_LPC1788 -I"include directory"-std=gnu99 -fstack-usage "include directory".

The last string "include directory" generates warning "linker input file unused because linking not done"

I have only added missing include directories from the 1.1.2.201310221203 version to the 1.1.4.201310301732.

Eclipse: the newest CDT Keppler
OS: Ubuntu 12.04.3 LTS

Discussion

  • Liviu Ionescu (ilg)

    • status: open --> open-accepted
    • assigned_to: Liviu Ionescu (ilg)
     
  • Liviu Ionescu (ilg)

    Hello Martin, thank you for your report.

    Unfortunately the cost of adding new features in version 1.1.3 was this small incompatibility with projects created by early versions.

    Could you try the fix suggested in the FAQ, the "Cannot use -c together with -o ... for multiple files" entry? (sorry for it, I know the .cproject file is quite large, but it might fix the problem).

     
  • Martin Velek

    Martin Velek - 2013-11-11

    Hello, sorry no, I did not. I was preparing the Eclipse for other persons and there was not time to do it. So I have downloaded the 1.1.2.201310221203 zip and installed it manually. Maybe in the future.

    Anyway I am really appreciating Your work, it helps a lot.

     
  • Liviu Ionescu (ilg)

    please keep in mind that 1.1.2 is not compatible with future versions, and all projects generated with it will not work with future versions.

    my advice is to DO NOT use 1.1.2 for any projects.

     
  • Liviu Ionescu (ilg)

    • status: open-accepted --> closed-out-of-date
     

Get latest updates about Open Source Projects, Conferences and News.

Sign up for the SourceForge newsletter:





No, thanks