|
From: Aubrey de G. F. a. <ag...@ge...> - 2005-02-28 12:34:57
|
I should probably clarify, for the record, that here: > I've chatted with Aubrey about this, and while he has some fairly > compelling arguments as to why the cv and dbxref modules could be merged > into one, he agrees with me that at this point in the game, the cost of > making such a fundamental change in the schema would be much greater > than any benefit we might realize. I only agree about this on the basis of what Dave reports about software already written by others. I still have grave concerns that leaving the cvterm and dbxref tables separate will be a long-term aggravation that we'll ultimately regret. But for now, as Dave says, adding the two new tables does what we need. Cheers A |