|
From: Mitch S. <mit...@be...> - 2007-08-25 00:42:02
|
Ian Holmes wrote: > How would this compare with existing systems e.g. Ensembl MART? > I've only spent a bit of time with it, but I don't see a way to view the results of a biomart query in the genome browser, which is what I was thinking. In addition to creating new tracks by uploading, we could allow people to create tracks by defining queries. It should be easy for us to track how popular these are, so there's a natural connection to the points and feedback/recognition items from the game/webapp article. Also, while you can specify a list of IDs to biomart, that requires the user to manage their own collection. We could certainly make collection management a lot easier (e.g., an "add this to my collection" button on feature popups). Centralizing collections also makes them easier to share (like the "post your hotlist" thing, with individual features instead of tracks). In addition to having a nice query building UI like biomart does, I think it makes sense to expose something lower level, like (say) raw SPARQL. Most biologists won't use it, but if we make it easy for more advanced users to share their queries with other people then it's still pretty useful IMO. But these are all just random ideas. Mainly, I wanted to ask for help translating game ideas into stuff that relates more concretely to what we're doing. Mitch |