|
From: gerardo r. <ge...@ho...> - 2003-04-08 11:22:50
|
An ontology can be used to describe an organism, but can it be used to describe a disease? Not in clinical terms (controlled vocabularies in medicine are used) but in biochemical terms, a disease may be seen as a mal function in one or many metabolic processes. So considering only metabolic pathways a disease can be fully described, and because metabolic pathways involve proteins and genes then real integration is achieved. The in formation in metabolic pathways describing a disease is in a real context. Ontology in molecular biology have been used in order to describe the function of biological objects; and now they have been incorporated in to most existing databases as one of the items, but the relations that this objects have among them have been leaved behind (at least has not being really incorporated in to the databases that have GO as one of the items in entries). So my question is: if a real model of a disease were to be built, would not this model have to consider more than just descriptions of the different objects that outline it (the disease) and focus more on the relations of this objects and how the balance among this objects is being disturbed in order for a disease to be produced? The infectious process along with all the rest of the processes that the disease have are any way part of the disease it self, and for studying the system as such it must be at some degree isolated (?). _________________________________________________________________ Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 |