From: Josh G. <jog...@in...> - 2018-01-11 05:24:31
|
* Are you using the eimage table? No * have you written eimage linker tables? No * Do you have strong images about changing the eimage table itself to image? No I would like to request that an image module allow for storing polygon annotations associated with images and linking those annotations with CV terms. FlyBase has around a thousand or so images that have been annotated but are not in our production Chado instance. For example, on http://flybase.org/reports/FBim0000898, you can mouse over the image and see the anatomy CV terms associated with particular areas or vice versa. One open question is whether to store the coordinate data in a prop type table (e.g. image_cvtermprop) or opt for a table that uses the polygon geometric type. I can throw this into a new or existing github issue if you want. Josh On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 5:37 PM Bradford Condon <bra...@gm...> wrote: > Dear Chado community, > > We are working on improvements for Chado 1.4 at PAG! You can see the > issues we are working on here <https://github.com/GMOD/Chado/issues>. > One of the improvements we are making is an image module from the > expression eimage table. > > We would like to hear from Chado users who use the expression module's > eimage table. We have a few options, but we are leaning towards keeping > eimage base table as is, and creating the linker tables as _image. This > is the least disruptive option, as the eimage table already exists (even if > it would hold all images, instead of just expression images.) > > * Are you using the eimage table? If so, to hold what sort of images? > * have you written eimage linker tables? If so have you named them > _eimage or _image? > * Do you have strong images about changing the eimage table itself to > image? > > Cheers > > Bradford > > > > Bradford Condon > Postdoctoral Scholar, University of Tennessee Knoxville > www.bradfordcondon.com > > > > > |