From: valentin.guignon <gu...@ci...> - 2017-06-27 07:27:05
|
I agree as well. Thx Chris, Val Le 26/06/2017 à 23:49, Josh Goodman a écrit : > +1 > > Josh > > On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 5:44 PM Chris Mungall <cjm...@lb... > <mailto:cjm...@lb...>> wrote: > > Looks like these lists are not used so much. Additionally, looks like > sourceforge may start kicking people off lists soon (see my email last > week to gmod-devel). > > What do people think about kickstarting a new list on google groups, > merging architecture and schema? I think there is a need for this. > Earlier today I had someone who was moving their database to chado and > were asking me about ontology loading. Additionally, there is a lot of > fragmented efforts to make a kind of 'chado 2' on top of graph databases > like Neo4J. See http://bit.ly/gmod-graph-database. I know many of us are > probably happy in our individual slack channels for different projects > but I think there is a missed opportunity to work together here. > > What I'm thinking is a new list gmod-architecture on google groups, with > broad contributions welcome, but with a focus on shared architecture > around graph databases. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Gmod-architecture mailing list > Gmo...@li... > <mailto:Gmo...@li...> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gmod-architecture > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gmod-schema mailing list > Gmo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gmod-schema > |