Re: [Gmod-schema] obographs JSON

[Scott C. <sc...@sc...>]

I think there a probably some people (besides me) using stag-storenode, but
probably not many.  The majority of Chado users these days are using
Tripal, so we'd want to see the current Tripal ontology loader updated as
well.  I cc'ed the dev list to make sure they're aware of it too (though I
imagine they're all on the Chado list too).


On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 7:38 AM, Chris Mungall <cjm...@lb...> wrote:

>
> For a while there has been a need of a developer-friendly replacement
> for OBO format. While advanced applications should target OWL, there a
> number of things that make direct OWL consumption developer-unfriendly
> (especially perl and python developers)
>
> We have come up with a proposed JSON representation that is intended to
> have the simplicity of OBO, with optional extensions for advanced OWL
> axioms - in JSON or YAML:
> https://github.com/geneontology/obographs
>
> The intent is for any replacements for stage-storenode.pl to target this
> (I'm not up to date on what people are currently using)
>
> It shouldn't be regarded as stable yet - I'd like feedback from the GMOD
> community first. Please email here or use the issue tracker with any
> comments, thanks!
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Gmod-schema mailing list
> Gmo...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gmod-schema
>



-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scott Cain, Ph. D.                                   scott at scottcain dot
net
GMOD Coordinator (http://gmod.org/)                     216-392-3087
Ontario Institute for Cancer Research