From: Chris M. <cjm...@lb...> - 2016-09-02 11:38:37
|
For a while there has been a need of a developer-friendly replacement for OBO format. While advanced applications should target OWL, there a number of things that make direct OWL consumption developer-unfriendly (especially perl and python developers) We have come up with a proposed JSON representation that is intended to have the simplicity of OBO, with optional extensions for advanced OWL axioms - in JSON or YAML: https://github.com/geneontology/obographs The intent is for any replacements for stage-storenode.pl to target this (I'm not up to date on what people are currently using) It shouldn't be regarded as stable yet - I'd like feedback from the GMOD community first. Please email here or use the issue tracker with any comments, thanks! |