Re: [Gmod-schema] defining organism groups

[Isabelle P. <isa...@sb...>]

Agreed. I think the correct module would be 'taxonomy', but organism is fine.
Note that the current table structure (genus, species, strain) breaks down for some bacteria (and also viruses, though I guess these are not included in Model Organisms).

Isabelle

--
Isabelle Phan, DPhil
Seattle Biomedical Research Institute
+1(206)256 7113



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hilmar Lapp [mailto:hl...@du...]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 2:07 PM
> To: Robert Buels
> Cc: sc...@sc...; gmod schema
> Subject: Re: [Gmod-schema] defining organism groups
>
>
> On Sep 23, 2009, at 2:12 PM, Robert Buels wrote:
>
> > Question is, should they go into
> >
> > A.) the organism module
> > B.) the phylogeny module
>
>
> As stated so far the rationale behind it doesn't strike me as
> having much or anything to do with phylogeny, so I vote for A.
>
> Organismprop could be used too. If you wanted to attach
> semantics to the grouping, it'd probably be the better way of
> doing this. Or the group table should have a link to cvterm.
>
>         -hilmar
> --
> ===========================================================
> : Hilmar Lapp  -:-  Durham, NC  -:- hlapp at duke dot edu :
> ===========================================================
>
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------------
> Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference
> in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this
> year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry
> mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve.
> Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register now!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf
> _______________________________________________
> Gmod-schema mailing list
> Gmo...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gmod-schema
>