last time we had a phone meeting, back in May there was a suggestion regarding the phenotype module to add a type_id to phenotype_cvterm (solve the post-composed terms issue . Need this to specify the relationship between the phenotype and the cvterm) and to think over adding phenotypeprop, but as a standard prop table (without cvalue_id) Is anyone using these tables this way ? I am currently using phenotype_cvterm for storing the units (using Unit Ontology terms) and I need phenotypeprop for grouping phenotypes for example by collection method (to be more specific, e.g. measurements of cross sections tomato fruits using software X) Does this sound like a good cause for adding phenotypeprop? I know I could use nd_experimentprop, but querying will be easier if the prop is linked directly to the phenotype. Is the method really a property of the phenotype, or the experiment? Any thoughts? thanks -Naama Naama Menda Boyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research Tower Rd Ithaca NY 14853 USA (607) 254 3569 Sol Genomics Network http://solgenomics.net/ nm249@...
Sign up for the SourceForge newsletter:No, thanks