From: Ian H. <ih...@be...> - 2010-10-11 17:45:57
|
Hi David, We did receive your email - thanks. There is actually a lighthouse ticket for this issue already, though it is somewhat cryptic: http://jbrowse.lighthouseapp.com/projects/23792/tickets/19-handle-wiggle-regions-that-span-tile-boundaries If you get a chance, it'd be great if you could post your files for recreating the issue as a comment/footnote to this ticket (I would do this myself but I seem to have misplaced your original email unfortunately) Best wishes Ian On 10/11/10 4:41 AM, David Breimann wrote: > Hello again, > > I just wanted to verify you have received this email. > > Best, > Dave > > On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 10:59 PM, David Breimann<dav...@gm...>wrote: > >> Hi Mitch, >> >> I didn't send this to the mailing list to avoid sharing the large files >> with everyone, but feel free to cc your reply to the list. >> >> I've encountered a strange phenomena: some peaks appear in tracks created >> from WIG files with no apparent reason. The WIG doesn't have any value that >> supports a "peak" in those positions. >> >> Recreate the situation: >> * start with a clean JBrowse clone. >> * prepare-refseq with the attached fasta file (in the archive). >> * wig-to-json with the attached WIG file (in the archive). >> * Now zoom in to position 68000. Attached is a print-screen of what I see. >> Inspect the WIG and see all the values at this area are 2-3 and there's no >> peak. >> >> Keep up the good work! >> Dave >> > |
From: Ian H. <ih...@be...> - 2010-10-11 23:38:41
|
Thanks David. I just committed a fix and closed the ticket. Best wishes, Ian David Breimann wrote: > > The files are attached again. I hope you'd be able to recreate and solve > the issue. > > Thanks, > Dave > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: *David Breimann* <dav...@gm... > <mailto:dav...@gm...>> > Date: Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 10:59 PM > Subject: JBrowse: Strange peaks appear in WIG tracks > To: Mitch Skinner <mit...@be... > <mailto:mit...@be...>> > Cc: Ian Holmes <ih...@be... <mailto:ih...@be...>> > > > Hi Mitch, > > I didn't send this to the mailing list to avoid sharing the large files > with everyone, but feel free to cc your reply to the list. > > I've encountered a strange phenomena: some peaks appear in tracks > created from WIG files with no apparent reason. The WIG doesn't have any > value that supports a "peak" in those positions. > > Recreate the situation: > * start with a clean JBrowse clone. > * prepare-refseq with the attached fasta file (in the archive). > * wig-to-json with the attached WIG file (in the archive). > * Now zoom in to position 68000. Attached is a print-screen of what I > see. Inspect the WIG and see all the values at this area are 2-3 and > there's no peak. > > Keep up the good work! > Dave > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > |
From: David B. <dav...@gm...> - 2010-10-12 06:23:26
|
Thank you very much Ian. On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 1:38 AM, Ian Holmes <ih...@be...> wrote: > Thanks David. I just committed a fix and closed the ticket. Best wishes, > Ian > > David Breimann wrote: > >> >> The files are attached again. I hope you'd be able to recreate and solve >> the issue. >> >> Thanks, >> Dave >> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: *David Breimann* <dav...@gm... <mailto: >> dav...@gm...>> >> Date: Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 10:59 PM >> Subject: JBrowse: Strange peaks appear in WIG tracks >> To: Mitch Skinner <mit...@be... <mailto: >> mit...@be...>> >> Cc: Ian Holmes <ih...@be... <mailto:ih...@be...>> >> >> >> Hi Mitch, >> >> I didn't send this to the mailing list to avoid sharing the large files >> with everyone, but feel free to cc your reply to the list. >> >> I've encountered a strange phenomena: some peaks appear in tracks created >> from WIG files with no apparent reason. The WIG doesn't have any value that >> supports a "peak" in those positions. >> >> Recreate the situation: >> * start with a clean JBrowse clone. >> * prepare-refseq with the attached fasta file (in the archive). >> * wig-to-json with the attached WIG file (in the archive). >> * Now zoom in to position 68000. Attached is a print-screen of what I see. >> Inspect the WIG and see all the values at this area are 2-3 and there's no >> peak. >> >> Keep up the good work! >> Dave >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> |
From: Ian H. <ih...@be...> - 2010-10-11 17:56:20
|
PS, I believe all we will really need is the WIG file If you can re-send this I will try to fix it today Best, Ian On 10/11/10 10:44 AM, Ian Holmes wrote: > Hi David, > > We did receive your email - thanks. > > There is actually a lighthouse ticket for this issue already, though it > is somewhat cryptic: > > http://jbrowse.lighthouseapp.com/projects/23792/tickets/19-handle-wiggle-regions-that-span-tile-boundaries > > If you get a chance, it'd be great if you could post your files for > recreating the issue as a comment/footnote to this ticket (I would do > this myself but I seem to have misplaced your original email unfortunately) > > Best wishes > Ian > > > > On 10/11/10 4:41 AM, David Breimann wrote: >> Hello again, >> >> I just wanted to verify you have received this email. >> >> Best, >> Dave >> >> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 10:59 PM, David Breimann<dav...@gm...>wrote: >> >>> Hi Mitch, >>> >>> I didn't send this to the mailing list to avoid sharing the large files >>> with everyone, but feel free to cc your reply to the list. >>> >>> I've encountered a strange phenomena: some peaks appear in tracks created >>> from WIG files with no apparent reason. The WIG doesn't have any value that >>> supports a "peak" in those positions. >>> >>> Recreate the situation: >>> * start with a clean JBrowse clone. >>> * prepare-refseq with the attached fasta file (in the archive). >>> * wig-to-json with the attached WIG file (in the archive). >>> * Now zoom in to position 68000. Attached is a print-screen of what I see. >>> Inspect the WIG and see all the values at this area are 2-3 and there's no >>> peak. >>> >>> Keep up the good work! >>> Dave >>> >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports > standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2& L3. > Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great > experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb > _______________________________________________ > Gmod-ajax mailing list > Gmo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gmod-ajax |