Thanks Ian. It does seem possible that the ruler would render the
blurriness just a minor annoyance and not a functional limitation; it's
hard to tell with my current view.
Steven
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009, Ian Holmes wrote:
> Yes, the blur is due to image rendering.
>
> It's certainly possible to fix, e.g. we could switch to a histogram built of
> DIV elements, when you get to base resolution. (The image is mainly useful
> for providing single-pixel resolution of WIG tracks, which is more important
> when zoomed-out.)
>
> I suspect that with the vertical ruler (which is already on our list, but
> this kind of feedback is invaluable in bumping it up towards the top) the
> blurriness might be less of a critical problem, because the width of the blur
> is actually small compared to the width of a base (but without the ruler, the
> blur does make it harder to line up to individual bases by eye).
>
>
>
> Brenton Graveley wrote:
>> FYI - Steven's comments. I haven't responded, but my understanding is that
>> the blurriness at high magnification is a results of the image rendering?
>> Not sure there is a solution...
>>
>> Brent
>>
>>
>>> That does look fantastic.
>>> Two questions for high zoom to nucleotide level
>>> * Is there any way to not have wiggles get 'blurry' ?
>>> * Is there any way to have a vertical 'ruler' to see exactly what
>>> base aligns with the tracks below?
>>>
>>> Steven
>
|
