RE: [Gml4j-devel] saxGML4J

[Rob H. <rob...@vf...>]

Alex et. al.,

I might be interested in leading this.  I care about encouraging client WFS
development and it is probably a good idea for me to see the other side of
the fence as well (GML parsing as opposed to be GML generation).  Let me
take a deeper look at the code this week and see what I think.  Off-hand, I
think that I might have a fairly simple approach that will work well with
your existing code.

Regards,
Rob

> -----Original Message-----
> From: gml...@li...
> [mailto:gml...@li...]On Behalf Of
> Aleksandar
> Milanovic
> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 6:37 PM
> To: GML4J-USER; GML4J-DEV
> Subject: [Gml4j-devel] saxGML4J
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> It's been a while since I posted my GML4J manifesto, but I've
> been too busy
> to do any followup work. Since this is unlikely to change
> soon, I am now
> looking for somebody to coordinate work on saxGML4J, which is
> deemed as the
> first priority. I can provide technical supervision and
> answer questions,
> but that's about it.
>
> The saxGML4J coordinator must be able to come up with a draft
> solution for
> the saxGML4J based on the current GML4J code (or parts of
> it). It should
> address any existing problems in GML4J (e.g. support for
> latest XML schema
> version, critical bugs). The coordinator may be the main (or
> even only)
> developer on saxGML4J, that's cool with me.
>
> Eagerly awaiting volunteers,
> Alex
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Tesla: “Science is but a perversion of itself unless it has
> as its ultimate
> goal the betterment of humanity"
>
> Privileged or confidential information may be contained in
> this message. If
> this message was not intended for you, destroy it and notify us
> immediately.Opinions, conclusions, recommendations, and other
> information
> presented in this message are not given or necessarily endorsed by my
> employer or firm.
>
>
>