Re: [Glsdk-devel] Documentation

[Jason M. <ko...@gm...>]

On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Branan Riley <br...@gm...> wrote:
> Yes, technically XSLT is the only way to transform it. I meant there
> are a number of programs already created that are already layered on
> top of XSLT, at least in Linux. I don't know about the Windows and Mac
> worlds. If we can use on of those, it saves us the trouble of writing
> our own.

I'm not sure I understand what you're talking about when you refer to
programs that are "layered on top of XSLT." Can you give me an
example?

We should not be looking for any XSLT implementation on the host
system. Instead, our system for building documents should use a
specific XSLT implementation (which takes specific command-line
arguments), and we should simply deliver the results.