Re: [Glsdk-devel] [GLM] implementation issue

[H. H. <hen...@gm...>]

... and GLM is compiled as a static lib and linked with glmtest.

On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 11:00 PM, Henri Häkkinen <hen...@gm...> wrote:

> ATM I am still in the process of writing test cases and correcting minor
> bugs in the GLM. The current implementation holds that the behavior is
> undefined if you pass NULL as function arguments:
>
>   glmMatInverse2f (&foo, NULL); // BOOM
>
> I use assert's in the implementation to test this. However CUnit does not
> have a way to override the assert inside the function glmMatInverse2f:
>
>   GLMmat2f *
>   glmMatInverse2f (GLMmat2f *out, const GLMmat2f *m)
>   {
>     ...
>     assert (out);
>     assert (m);
>     ...
>   }
>
> And there cannot be because assert is usually defined as a macro.
>
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 8:22 PM, Orhun Birsoy <orh...@gm...>wrote:
>
>> pudman
>> OK, you convinced me for including such cases (asserts) in unit tests.
>> Thanks...
>>
>> One question though, will CUnit be able to override the assert in that
>> function so that the tests can continue?
>>
>> --
>> Orhun Birsoy
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's
>> challenge
>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great
>> prizes
>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the
>> world
>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
>> _______________________________________________
>> Glsdk-devel mailing list
>> Gls...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/glsdk-devel
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Henri 'henux' Häkkinen
>
>


-- 
Henri 'henux' Häkkinen