Re: [Glsdk-devel] [GLM] implementation issue

[H. H. <hen...@gm...>]

Well no it does not but is that assert even necessary in tutorials?

On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 7:00 PM, Orhun Birsoy <orh...@gm...> wrote:

> Is assert a code path? I think it is not. I mean that`s the whole point,
> the code should have a single path. I always thought unit tests are for
> release (i.e production), so there will be no error behavior (i.e. assert)
> in release builds. If this is a problem then I would suggest to remove the
> assert all together.
>
> More on removing the assert:
> Inverse operation is not something you use when you are a newbie (drawing a
> cube does not require one or at least not in CPU). When you start using
> matrix inverses, a well placed, briefly commented assert(glmMatDeterm4f (m)
> != 0) [or something similar] in a glsdk tutorial will not confuse anybody.
> Or will it?
>
> --
> Orhun Birsoy
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's
> challenge
> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great
> prizes
> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
> _______________________________________________
> Glsdk-devel mailing list
> Gls...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/glsdk-devel
>
>


-- 
Henri 'henux' Häkkinen