Re: [Glsdk-devel] License

[H. H. <hen...@gm...>]

Khronos license is basically the same as MIT, except it uses the word
'Material' instead of 'Software' and with Khronos copyright. We can't use
Khronos in the copyright for the obvious reasons (we are not affiliated with
it).


On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 11:30 PM, Henri Häkkinen <hen...@gm...> wrote:

> I have committed changes with the MIT license in each source (perhaps too
> hastly). We can later change it to the Khronos license.
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 10:54 PM, Rick Yorgason <ri...@fi...> wrote:
>
>> Henri Häkkinen wrote:
>> > Okay good. If anyone else does not have objections or points, can we
>> > conclude we use the MIT license? Someone post a verbatim copy of the
>> > license here so I can include it to my GLM sources, please.
>>
>> Why not the Khronos license?  http://glew.sourceforge.net/khronos.txt
>>
>> It's basically just the MIT license, but with a name OpenGL users are
>> familiar with.
>>
>> -Rick-
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's
>> challenge
>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great
>> prizes
>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the
>> world
>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
>> _______________________________________________
>> Glsdk-devel mailing list
>> Gls...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/glsdk-devel
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Henri 'henux' Häkkinen
>
>


-- 
Henri 'henux' Häkkinen