From: H. H. <hen...@gm...> - 2008-08-25 20:26:10
|
Thank you for willingness to contribute. Packaging is not yet an issue, but we will perhaps contact you when the time is right. Paths for other IDEs besides MSVC is a good idea and we will probably have that too. On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 11:02 PM, Rick Yorgason <ri...@fi...> wrote: > Henri Häkkinen wrote: > > Some thoughts about GLSDK packaging: > > > > - on Windows; we could distribute GLSDK as .zipped source package and a > > .msi installer > > I have a fair bit of experience with NSIS. I'd be willing to create > Windows .exe installers, and it probably wouldn't be too difficult to > have the installer offer to set up the proper command line and Visual > Studio paths. (Maybe also an OSS IDE, like Code::Blocks?) > > > - on Linux; as a source tarballs and debian packages > > I know less about this, but it would be nice to maintain a Ubuntu > package so that users could install the SDK straight through the package > manager. (It would also be a source of cross-advertising.) I'd be > willing to look into that as well, but I don't have Linux at my office, > so if I'm in charge of the Linux package it may lag behind the Windows > installer. > > -Rick- > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's > challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great > prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > Glsdk-devel mailing list > Gls...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/glsdk-devel > -- Henri 'henux' Häkkinen |