OK, CUnit sounds good. It should be easy enough to integrate into CMake
Branna
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Henri Häkkinen <hen...@gm...> wrote:
> Yes, I agree that we should keep the technical discussion in the mailing
> lists. However sometimes we may want to engage into real-time discussions,
> if for nothing else but to say hi to our community, and in that case IRC is
> fine.
>
> I have began to write unit tests for the GLM library and I have chosen CUnit
> framework that.
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 8:53 PM, Jason McKesson <ko...@gm...> wrote:
>>
>> Henri Häkkinen wrote:
>> > branan: I assume your registered nick on freenode is 'branan'
>> >
>> > Korval: have you registered into freenode? 'Korval' is not found
>> >
>> No, not really.
>>
>> Personally, I don't find an IRC channel to be an effective method of
>> communication. Particularly for highly technical discussions like these.
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's
>> challenge
>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great
>> prizes
>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the
>> world
>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
>> _______________________________________________
>> Glsdk-devel mailing list
>> Gls...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/glsdk-devel
>
>
>
> --
> Henri 'henux' Häkkinen
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great
> prizes
> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
> _______________________________________________
> Glsdk-devel mailing list
> Gls...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/glsdk-devel
>
>
|
