Re: [Glftpd2-discussion] Hello :)

[Torkel L. <to...@ya...>]

Even better, I'll write a small example. There is one downside doing it
this way, it will require some additional load. But the load of an FTPD
ain't that much to worry about.

On Sun, 2003-03-23 at 14:54, HoE wrote:
> well thats great, could you write some info about how it should work
> how to implement it, how the modules will communicate etc
>=20
> On Sun, Mar 23, 2003 at 06:05:29AM +0100, Torkel Lyng wrote:
> > Hello, I recently got informed about this project by hujer when speakin=
g
> > to him on irc about pftp's and glftpd's openssl implementation.
> >=20
> > I've got the impression of that you want to base this new project on an
> > allready existing ftpd. I'd like to create one from scratch, making it
> > 200% modular, even implement FTPD and INET (sockets, ipv4, ipv6, tcp,
> > udl, ssl etc) as modules. Making it possible to replace/reload modules
> > runtime :) I also want to use a multithreaded server design :]
> > Making it this modular makes the daemon super-extensible. It will even
> > be possible to implement SOAP services on it if they want :P
> >=20
> > --=20
> > Torkel Lyng <to...@ya...>
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open!=20
> Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and=20
> the chance of winning an Apple iPod:
> http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en
> _______________________________________________
> Glftpd2-discussion mailing list
> Glf...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/glftpd2-discussion
--=20
Torkel Lyng <to...@ya...>