|
From: Brian P. <br...@va...> - 2000-12-20 23:26:51
|
Rik Faith wrote: > > On Wed 20 Dec 2000 12:10:15 -0500, > Rik Faith <fa...@va...> wrote: > > Is anyone seeing the paths test failing when run as part of a complete > > test suite (i.e., but not failing when run individually)? > > > > I'm trying to make sure my branch behaves like the trunk, but I can't > > ever get the trunk to pass a paths tests when it's run as part of a > > complete suite... > > OK, I found a bug on my branch and now I fail in the same way that the > trunk fails. This is good and bad. > > The good part is that the branch is ready for final review. I'll send > out another posting soon. > > The bad part is that paths will fail after maskedClear for some old > version of software Mesa. If you see paths failing with a new version, > try this: > > ./glean -t +paths <-- always passed > > ./glean -t +maskedClear+paths <-- always fails (on old software Mesa): > > paths: FAIL rgb8, db, z16, s8, accrgba16, win+pmap, id 0 > Stencil Test should have had no effect but actually modified the fragment > paths: FAIL rgb8, db, z16, s8, accrgba16, win+pmap, id 0 > Stencil Test should have had no effect but actually modified the fragment > paths: FAIL rgb8, db, z16, s8, accrgba16, win+pmap, id 0 > Stencil Test should have had no effect but actually modified the fragment > paths: FAIL rgb8, db, z16, s8, accrgba16, win+pmap, id 0 > Stencil Test should have had no effect but actually modified the fragment > > I haven't tried this on a recent Mesa, so it's probably nothing to worry > about. I seem to recall a color mask problem in an older versions of Mesa. The glean path test has worked fine for me since Mesa 3.4, at least. -Brian |