|
From: Rik F. <fa...@va...> - 2000-12-20 18:22:13
|
On Wed 20 Dec 2000 12:10:15 -0500,
Rik Faith <fa...@va...> wrote:
> Is anyone seeing the paths test failing when run as part of a complete
> test suite (i.e., but not failing when run individually)?
>
> I'm trying to make sure my branch behaves like the trunk, but I can't
> ever get the trunk to pass a paths tests when it's run as part of a
> complete suite...
OK, I found a bug on my branch and now I fail in the same way that the
trunk fails. This is good and bad.
The good part is that the branch is ready for final review. I'll send
out another posting soon.
The bad part is that paths will fail after maskedClear for some old
version of software Mesa. If you see paths failing with a new version,
try this:
./glean -t +paths <-- always passed
./glean -t +maskedClear+paths <-- always fails (on old software Mesa):
paths: FAIL rgb8, db, z16, s8, accrgba16, win+pmap, id 0
Stencil Test should have had no effect but actually modified the fragment
paths: FAIL rgb8, db, z16, s8, accrgba16, win+pmap, id 0
Stencil Test should have had no effect but actually modified the fragment
paths: FAIL rgb8, db, z16, s8, accrgba16, win+pmap, id 0
Stencil Test should have had no effect but actually modified the fragment
paths: FAIL rgb8, db, z16, s8, accrgba16, win+pmap, id 0
Stencil Test should have had no effect but actually modified the fragment
I haven't tried this on a recent Mesa, so it's probably nothing to worry
about.
|