Rik Faith wrote:
>
> On Wed 20 Dec 2000 12:10:15 -0500,
> Rik Faith <fa...@va...> wrote:
> > Is anyone seeing the paths test failing when run as part of a complete
> > test suite (i.e., but not failing when run individually)?
> >
> > I'm trying to make sure my branch behaves like the trunk, but I can't
> > ever get the trunk to pass a paths tests when it's run as part of a
> > complete suite...
>
> OK, I found a bug on my branch and now I fail in the same way that the
> trunk fails. This is good and bad.
>
> The good part is that the branch is ready for final review. I'll send
> out another posting soon.
>
> The bad part is that paths will fail after maskedClear for some old
> version of software Mesa. If you see paths failing with a new version,
> try this:
>
> ./glean -t +paths <-- always passed
>
> ./glean -t +maskedClear+paths <-- always fails (on old software Mesa):
>
> paths: FAIL rgb8, db, z16, s8, accrgba16, win+pmap, id 0
> Stencil Test should have had no effect but actually modified the fragment
> paths: FAIL rgb8, db, z16, s8, accrgba16, win+pmap, id 0
> Stencil Test should have had no effect but actually modified the fragment
> paths: FAIL rgb8, db, z16, s8, accrgba16, win+pmap, id 0
> Stencil Test should have had no effect but actually modified the fragment
> paths: FAIL rgb8, db, z16, s8, accrgba16, win+pmap, id 0
> Stencil Test should have had no effect but actually modified the fragment
>
> I haven't tried this on a recent Mesa, so it's probably nothing to worry
> about.
I seem to recall a color mask problem in an older versions of Mesa. The
glean path test has worked fine for me since Mesa 3.4, at least.
-Brian
|
