Re: [gl-dev] move to xml?

[Landshark <lan...@ve...>]

On Fri, Dec 27, 2002 at 12:00:38PM -0600, Dave Dribin wrote:
> </gpl-rant>

Well.  I'm still pretty much impartial to licensese :)


> > I chose Qt because I think it is designed much nicer than any other
> > toolkit out there.  Everything seems logical with how you do it.
> 
> I can't dispute that, as I've never used QT.  On the Linux side, I've
> always been more of a GNOME fan.

I started with Xlib (before GTK was around), and didn't like it.  Then I
moved to GTK when that showed up.  It was better than Xlib, but still
'ok.'  I then moved to Qt, which I liked tons better.  Then Gnome
arrived.  I tried it, and it's 'ok,' but I still am not a big fan of the
whole GTK thing.  Making custom widgets is a total pain in the butt and
some of the widgets were a total pain in the butt to use (GTKClist comes
to mind).  Qt has always been logical.

 
> > wxPython is an idea.  Does it work on windows as well?  I looked at that
> > while looking at wxWindows and it looked cool on the linux side.

I've got it all setup on my windows box.  I did crash the demo once.
I'm gonna set it up on my linux box.  From what I've seen, I like it.

-- 
-dave

Duct tape is like the force.  It has a light side and a dark side,
and it holds the universe together.  - Carl Zwanzig