From: Richard G. <ric...@st...> - 2000-04-10 08:50:43
|
On Mon, 10 Apr 2000, Richard Guenther wrote: > On Sun, 9 Apr 2000, David O'Toole wrote: > > > Richard Guenther wrote: > > > > > Btw. the more relevant intend of my (GLAME) reply was to stress that > > > GLAME will not switch to be a LADSPA host, i.e. it will keep its > > > special plugin interface. I suspect this is true for other projects, > > > too - so the point of having LADSPA is to write plugins that run > > > (inferior) on all hosts? This doesnt sound that interesting, though. > > > > I have to agree with you here; it would be difficult and pointless to > > switch OCTAL to being a LADSPA host, even if LADSPA was good enough to > > support the features needed by the OCTAL model. > > > > By the way, how is the project going? I spoke with one of the other > > GLAME developers a while back, since I thought that OCTAL and GLAME > > would go well together on a Linux musician's desktop. > > Its going quite well - but after the 0.2.0 release we will do some > major cleanups of the backend and a GUI rewrite, the GUI is currently > lacking motivated coders :)) Wheee - It seems we have a very motivated coder for the GUI now :)) I really should read all mails before replying to another one :)) Richard. -- Richard Guenther <ric...@st...> WWW: http://www.anatom.uni-tuebingen.de/~richi/ The GLAME Project: http://www.glame.de/ |