Re: LADSPA plugin failure?

[Richard G. <rg...@ta...>]

On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, Daniel James wrote:

> > > [root@server lib]# ls -l libsfftw.so
> > > ls: libsfftw.so: No such file or directory
> >
> > This link should be part of the development package (i.e.
> > fftw-2.1.3-dev or the like), as is the header file. If it is not,
> > its a bug in the package...
>
> They do indeed split some of the files into
> fftw-devel-2.1.3-8mdk.i586.rpm, including libsfftw.so which I assume
> is a symlink.
>
> I compiled Glame sucessfully without the fftw-devel package because I
> already had the header file in /usr/include, probably from an earlier
> build.
>
> But libsfftw.so.2.0.5 is included in the standard package, so an
> extra symlink from libsfftw.so can't hurt, can it?

It cant hurt, but it belongs to the devel package as it is used only
for compile time linking, not runtime linking.

Richard.

--
Richard Guenther <ric...@un...>
WWW: http://www.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de/~rguenth/
The GLAME Project: http://www.glame.de/