Re: [gl4java-usergroup] Re: Is GL4Java dead ?

[Pepijn V. E. <pep...@lu...>]

Alban Cousinié wrote:
> Hi Pepijn :)
> 
> 
>>Just a small correction, gl4java maps openGL 1.3 (at least the cvs
>>version does). So no vertex/fragment programs yet :)
> 
> Well we'd need 1.4 support for sure.
> About gl4java updates, I personally have access to the gl4java sourcefore
> CVS so I may update some code for you. But I guess Sven could register you
> as a gl4java developer if you ask him.
> 
> I'd be very interested to integrate an OpenAL binding into OpenMind if it is
> LGPL. I'd like to review yours if you are ok.
> 

Great, I'll send you a version as soon as I get it up and running. If 
you wish to integrate it into your engine LGPL is fine for me.

Pepijn

> Regards,
> 
> Alban
> 
> 
> Le 27/04/03 14:50, « Pepijn Van Eeckhoudt » <pep...@lu...>
> a écrit :
> 
> 
>>Just a small correction, gl4java maps openGL 1.3 (at least the cvs
>>version does). So no vertex/fragment programs yet :)
>>
>>I've been hacking away at the gl4java source code lately. I reworked
>>the make script to be a bit more readable. My version works fine on
>>linux, windows(using cl/link instead of gcc/ld) and solaris. No mac os
>>x yet. Gerard Ziemski's port uses pbxbuild to build the everything and
>>I would prefer to use gcc directly, but I haven't figured out how to do
>>that yet. You said that a colleague had made an ant build script. Is it
>>practical to use ant to compile c code?
>>
>>After reworking the makefile I started playing with the GLCanvas class.
>>While hacking away at the code I ended up removing 2/3 of the source
>>code. Strangely enough everything still works fine :). I do have to
>>admit that I did strip out some functionality (the ancient jvm support
>>(like netscape and ms builtin ones), offscreen rendering, etc). I'm
>>doing this effort to better understand how the rendering from native
>>code is done. Personally I would just rely on JAWT to do this, but Max
>>Gilead already mentioned that support for open jvms is important to him
>>(kaffe, sablevm, ...) and these don't support JAWT yet.
>>Anyway, in short I'm working on understanding the code, but I'm not
>>sure in which direction further development should be headed. Any ideas
>>are welcome. Also I don't have access to the gl4java sourceforge
>>project, so if I would want to make my version available I would have
>>to make a separate project.
>>Next to that I've been busy making an OpenAL binding. A first version
>>is almost complete. If anyone is interested in testing this I would be
>>more than happy to make it available online (on sourceforge I guess).
>>
>>Pepijn Van Eeckhoudt
>>
> 
>