From: <te...@at...> - 2000-04-13 10:53:29
|
Kerry: Maybe, I missed an earlier mailing but what about JavaScript - absolutely no relation to Java but it survives? Tegwyn > At 02:28 PM 4/12/00 +0200, Max Gilead wrote: > > > >"Kerry L. Bonin" wrote: > > > >> For marks protecting products or product lines, it is considered "dilution" > >> and "confusing to the marketplace" if someone else uses a product or > >> product name which encorporates your mark, no matter how subtly. > > > >One thing I don't understand: there are zillions web pages, magazines that > are > >named like "JavaCats", "JavaCenter", "Javablahblah" etc. Is it OK?? > > > >Does *ALL* other software folks that uses Java in their names pay for it? > > That's one of those gray "fair use" areas. For non-product names, such as > a news and information site, a mark holder can [generally] cut leeway > without it being used against them in a product related suit. Some > organizations choose to be aggressive and stop everybody from doing > anything - Disney, Lego. Others allow more slack. The pseudo-"open" > aspect of the "community process" and the "open" Java standards forces this > position somewhat. > > The differentiating factor is product vs. non-product, regardless of > product price and terms. > > It all comes back to mark "dilution" suits for product infringement. One > interesting current example is the Sun-M$ suit r/e Microsoft's attempts to > continue to use the term "Java" for their increasingly divergent > implementation. For example, if Sun doesn't watch how "Java" is used, > Microsoft may win the right to call their implementation "ActiveJava" or > "BillyBoyJava" or "RealJava" regardless of specification compliance. > Kerry L. Bonin > Sr. Engineer, Security/Cryptography & Advanced Visualization, Cisco Systems. > VScape lead architect - Adaptive secure clustering for multiuser VR. > > _______________________________________________ > gl4java-usergroup mailing list > gl4...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/gl4java-usergroup |