Re: [gl4java-usergroup] Small change in GL4J API needed

[Sven G. <sgo...@ja...>]

Max Gilead wrote:
> 
> Pontus Lidman wrote:
> 
> > Can't you just pass gl and glu as parameters to your rendering function?
> 
> I can and there's even simpler solution (public GLFunc gl; this.gl =
> super.gl). But I thought that if it is common that people must create
> workarounds for this, it would be good to change it. So I should have put
> 'proposal' not 'need' in previous' message subject line.
> 
> How do other people think? Sven?

Well, the protected access-specifier for the attributes :
	GLFunc gl
	GLUFunc glu
	GLContext glj
are provided, because of the "privacy" and "read only" for foreign
packages.
Well, I guess we can change protected -> public, 
if we do not want to save the attributes from writing by foreign
packages
- OR we can create a getGL(), getGLU() and getGLJ() method !

So, please make your vote !
-- 
mailto:sgo...@ja...
www: http://www.jausoft.com
voice: +49-521-2399440, +49-170-2115963; fax: +49-521-2399442