From: Max G. <gi...@ye...> - 2003-02-27 12:29:52
|
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Pepijn Van Eeckhoudt wrote: > I agree that this would be great if it is possible. My first goal of > cleaning up the build stuff requires a lot of reorganizing in the code > base. I realize that stuff like code style, directory structures, etc > are mostly personal taste, which is why I had the idea of creating a > seperate cvs repository. Separate cvs repository is good idea for code reorganization. It sounded like you wanted to start completely separate project. > the only parts that belong in the cvs repository are those > bits that are not autogenerated (or at least not the intermediate > files). Autogenerated files would be dumped in some temporary directory > under the build dir and cleaned up when they are no longer required. Aggreed with one exception: CVS should contain files which are generated using external/nonstandard tools. Headers etc. should not be included but output from separate parsers, generators etc. should be. > I don't have any experience with gcj, so I have no idea how easy it > would be to support it. What other java implementations did you have in > mind? Kaffe, ORP for example. But compiled code would be priority IMHO. I've done some work with gcj and it's nice and all except its support for newer libraries/language features is rather incomplete. However support for it is important. > Do you know if Sven has any design documents of the library? Don't know, sorry. Regards, Max |