Re: [Gitstat-devel] [gitstat-devel] trivial piece of work.

[Paul V. <pau...@gm...>]

Hi,

이정승 wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Ah,,,
> I could remember.
> I'd removed </div> tag...because of that reason. anyway, I restored it,again.
> but we should fix that bugs,

Yes, something I wanted to do for a (relatively) long time.

> 
> 
> And...there are trivial piece of work.
> 
> 1. I tested gitstat with GCC git tree.
>     but, I could not install gitstat-gcc with that msg.
> 
> ============================================================
> ------------------------------------------------------
>  Processing... It can take a long time (around 40 minutes)
> ------------------------------------------------------
> DBD::mysql::st execute failed: You have an error in your SQL syntax;
> check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the
> right syntax to use near '' at line 1 at lib/lib.pl line 127.
> DBD::mysql::st execute failed: Column 'subcategory4' cannot be null at
> ./gitstat.pl line 250.
> Column 'subcategory4' cannot be null at lib/log.pl line 33.
> 

I haven't touched any of the perl stuff yet. I will have a look as well.

> 
> ============================================================
> 
>    I didn't see that problem deeply.
>    It is a critical problem for gitstat.
> 
> 2. gitstat function On/Off
> 
> 
> - Domain chart problem
>     There are some git tree that don't show e-mail address directly.
> 
>      for example,
>      git://git.infradead.org/gcc.git
> 
>      That git-tree show e-mail address like that
>      gccadmin@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4
> 
>      so gitstat could not get domain information. and could not make
> domain chart.
> 
>      We should make some configuration for this case

I'll also have a look this weekend.

> 
> -   see this page.
> 
>       http://wilma.vub.ac.be/~se1_0708/Git-Statistics/
> 
>       They are not using E-mail service and Diff-manager..:-(

Diff-manager makes sense as it could fill up your harddisk.

>       anyway, gitstat user need gitstat On/Off function...

Can you explain what you mean here?

Cheers,

Paul.