From: Paul M. <le...@li...> - 2007-11-12 09:34:00
|
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 10:27:05AM +0100, Paul Vriens wrote: > We know to what tag a commit belongs so it's fine to use that for the graph. > > The reason that the numbers were not correct is purely the date of the > commits (AFAIK). If I take for example commit > e7bd34a15b85655f24d1b45edbe3bdfebf9d027e: > [snip] > This patch dates Jul-31 whereas 2.6.23 came out on Oct-9. > I don't know if it matters or not, but I do frequently rebase my trees, which results in a different timestamp for commit and author. Perhaps this is something that tripped up gitstat? |