From: Paul V. <pau...@gm...> - 2007-11-12 09:27:23
|
Paul Vriens wrote: > Hi, > > Yes stupid thinko(s). > > Using the date for the tags was a bad idea in this case. We picked the > date from the tags and used that as limits. What basically happened was: > > get date of last tag : Dec-1-2007 > get date of the tag before that : Nov-1-2007 > > and then we calculate the commits between those dates. That's obviously > wrong as the date marks the 'end of a release'. > > Please forget the bogus explanation. The fix I committed is correct but for different reasons as stated above. We know to what tag a commit belongs so it's fine to use that for the graph. The reason that the numbers were not correct is purely the date of the commits (AFAIK). If I take for example commit e7bd34a15b85655f24d1b45edbe3bdfebf9d027e: [paul@penguin linux-2.6.git]$ git show e7bd34a15b85655f24d1b45edbe3bdfebf9d027e commit e7bd34a15b85655f24d1b45edbe3bdfebf9d027e Author: Paul Mundt <le...@li...> Date: Tue Jul 31 17:07:28 2007 +0900 sh: Support explicit L1 cache disabling. This reworks the cache mode configuration in Kconfig, and allows for explicit selection of write-back/write-through/off configurations. All of the cache flushing routines are optimized away for the off case. Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <le...@li...> This patch dates Jul-31 whereas 2.6.23 came out on Oct-9. git-gui shows for this commit: Follow : v2.6.23-rc7 Precedes : v2.6.24-rc1 Cheers, Paul. |