From: Paul V. <pau...@gm...> - 2008-11-06 07:07:28
|
Hi, ??? wrote: > Hi, > > I think that, It is a bit strage to use CVS as gitstat SCM, too. > When I released first gitstat, we(me and Shawn) needed web hosting > service for gitstat. > we thought that sourceforget could give us hosting service, > and choose sourceforge.net <http://sourceforge.net> as project site and > then used CVS. > Actually, original gitstat was not developed in SCM environment.(and not > needed) :) > > As suggested by Jakub , there are many hosting service for git. > then.., how about this service? (http://repo.or.cz/) That one is fine, but they only do GIT repo storage. > > and after moved done, maybe It is useless to use sourceforge CVS service. > > >- Which files should be ignored? > I don't understand this issue.. What is that meaning? Not necessarily a GIT thing. We have for example some generated config files. Not something you want in a SCM. We maybe have to make changes to the code or get rid of these files in the repository (or just mark them as to be ignored by the SCM). > > >Apart from that, a major change I would like to propose is to get rid > of tabs > >and start using 4-spaces instead. I think gitstat can still use a lot > of cleanup. > > As I mentioned before, It is good to write code :) > > After first gitstat release, 1 years passed, Actually there are few > changes recent 6 months, > and there is no commit from me. I'm sorry about that. Well there hasn't been a commit from me either. Maybe having this thing in GIT will boost the number of developers ;-). As said before. I have plans enough but lack of time prevents me to work on gitstat. > > Nowaday, I try to make some functional changes for admin. I searched > site using gitstat for other project(not kernel). > I thought that gitstat is not general to use other project still now. > Their graph is not good to see information. > (e.g. long-size text tag name, or they has too many tag....) > So, I'll make some function for modify that. I agree that we don't deal nicely will all those projects out there. I'm mainly using it to check Wine and seen how gitstat behaves. Ever since Wine has a devel and a stable release things got worse in gitstat (I basically ignore the stable tags now). Cheers, Paul. |