Menu
▾
▴
gitclipse-codereview — Gitclipse code reviews
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2008 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(6) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|---|
|
From: Michael S. <mic...@cs...> - 2008-07-31 18:38:03
|
That's great... I also think they should be public. Thanks for doing that. -Michael On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 11:52 AM, Andrew Case <ac...@co...> wrote: > Hey guys/gals, > > Javagit has made their build/codereview mailing lists public. I went > ahead and did the same with ours. If anyone thinks these should be > private for a reason let me know and I'll change it back. > > -- > Drew > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's > challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great > prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > Gitclipse-build mailing list > Git...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gitclipse-build > > |
|
From: Andrew C. <ac...@co...> - 2008-07-31 15:52:32
|
Hey guys/gals, Javagit has made their build/codereview mailing lists public. I went ahead and did the same with ours. If anyone thinks these should be private for a reason let me know and I'll change it back. -- Drew |
|
From: Michelle S O. <ms...@ny...> - 2008-07-18 01:33:19
|
I believe we're talking about two different things.. swapping out actions for commands vs swapping out dialogs for wizards. Switching the actions out for commands shouldn't take more than a few minutes. I'm not sure how the argument that we're voluntarily using page abstractions when we implement dialogs is compelling. I really don't see the benefit of using one over the other, and both IDEs that I regularly use have dialogs rather than wizards for most svn-related tasks. I hate to be the argumentative one, but this just feels like a waste of effort for questionable benefit. Michelle ----- Original Message ----- From: pm...@ny... Date: Thursday, July 17, 2008 7:26 pm Subject: Re: [Gitclipse-devel] Commands vs ActionDelegates code review To: Michelle S Osborne <ms...@ny...>, Patrick Winters <pat...@ny...> Cc: Code Review <git...@li...>, Git...@sc..., Gitclipse Devel <git...@li...> > Hold on. Patrick's previous argument was compelling, so I am sold on > wizards. > > But let's not rewrite something for the sake of rewriting it until > this week's requirements for release are done. > > Remember this week's task list, they are all on the Milestones page. > > * do we have a plugin build of javagit yet? > > -P > > > > ------Original Message------ > From: Michelle S Osborne > Sender: > To: Patrick Winters > Cc: Code Review > Cc: Git...@sc... > Cc: Gitclipse Devel > Sent: Jul 17, 2008 6:55 PM > Subject: Re: [Gitclipse-devel] Commands vs ActionDelegates code review > > I'll take care of them. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Patrick Winters <pat...@ny...> > Date: Thursday, July 17, 2008 5:32 pm > Subject: [Gitclipse-devel] Commands vs ActionDelegates code review > To: Gitclipse Devel <git...@li...> > Cc: Gitclipse Code Review <git...@li...> > > > > In Gitclipse-5 I tried to convert some actions to the command > > framework. We > > have a lot of action delegates that need to be re-written as commands. > > Anybody want to take a stab at it? > > -- > > Patrick > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win > great > > prizes > > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in > the > > world > > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > > _______________________________________________ > > Gitclipse-devel mailing list > > Git...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gitclipse-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great > prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the > world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > Gitclipse-devel mailing list > Git...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gitclipse-devel > > > Sent via BlackBerry |
|
From: <pm...@ny...> - 2008-07-17 23:26:05
|
Hold on. Patrick's previous argument was compelling, so I am sold on wizards. But let's not rewrite something for the sake of rewriting it until this week's requirements for release are done. Remember this week's task list, they are all on the Milestones page. * do we have a plugin build of javagit yet? -P ------Original Message------ From: Michelle S Osborne Sender: To: Patrick Winters Cc: Code Review Cc: Git...@sc... Cc: Gitclipse Devel Sent: Jul 17, 2008 6:55 PM Subject: Re: [Gitclipse-devel] Commands vs ActionDelegates code review I'll take care of them. ----- Original Message ----- From: Patrick Winters <pat...@ny...> Date: Thursday, July 17, 2008 5:32 pm Subject: [Gitclipse-devel] Commands vs ActionDelegates code review To: Gitclipse Devel <git...@li...> Cc: Gitclipse Code Review <git...@li...> > In Gitclipse-5 I tried to convert some actions to the command > framework. We > have a lot of action delegates that need to be re-written as commands. > Anybody want to take a stab at it? > -- > Patrick > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great > prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the > world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > Gitclipse-devel mailing list > Git...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gitclipse-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Gitclipse-devel mailing list Git...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gitclipse-devel Sent via BlackBerry |
|
From: Michelle S O. <ms...@ny...> - 2008-07-17 22:55:04
|
I'll take care of them. ----- Original Message ----- From: Patrick Winters <pat...@ny...> Date: Thursday, July 17, 2008 5:32 pm Subject: [Gitclipse-devel] Commands vs ActionDelegates code review To: Gitclipse Devel <git...@li...> Cc: Gitclipse Code Review <git...@li...> > In Gitclipse-5 I tried to convert some actions to the command > framework. We > have a lot of action delegates that need to be re-written as commands. > Anybody want to take a stab at it? > -- > Patrick > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great > prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the > world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > Gitclipse-devel mailing list > Git...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gitclipse-devel |
|
From: Patrick W. <pat...@ny...> - 2008-07-17 22:31:34
|
In Gitclipse-5 I tried to convert some actions to the command framework. We have a lot of action delegates that need to be re-written as commands. Anybody want to take a stab at it? -- Patrick |
