Re: [Ginp-developers] BUG :-(

[Doug C. <do...@cu...>]

Before you reply who has a 44kbps modem? I do.

Also there is no reason why we can not do a style for mobile phones 
etc... that have a bandwidth problem.....

Doug

Doug Culnane wrote:

> I used to do this in version 0.10  I think but it was madness.  4MB 
> over a 44kbps line to resize to 300px height is bad.  Let the sever 
> work.  We could store a middle size thumb and resize that which will 
> save bandwidth and cpu/mem.
> Doug
>
>
> Justin wrote:
>
>>
>> I think making thumbnails is a good idea.  However,  this kind of per 
>> request image scaling is going to use a lot of memory and cpu and can 
>> be just as easily be done on the client at the cost of slightly more 
>> bandwidth.
>>
>> On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 10:01, Justin wrote:
>>
>>> I looked at the code and when the height is on you have to take a 
>>> 500k compressed image, decompress it and make another copy of it 
>>> transformed.     This is a very memory intensive operation.  When 
>>> you don't put the height parameter on it you can just stream it off 
>>> of the disk a byte at a time and this works fine.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>>     Justin
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
>>> Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
>>> by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
>>> Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ginp-developers mailing list
>>> Gin...@li...
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ginp-developers
>>
>>
>>
>
>


-- 
Doug Culnane
do...@cu...
www.culnane.net