Re: [Ginp-developers] BUG :-(

[Justin <ju...@ww...>]

I think making thumbnails is a good idea.  However,  this kind of per 
request image scaling is going to use a lot of memory and cpu and can be 
just as easily be done on the client at the cost of slightly more 
bandwidth.

On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 10:01, Justin wrote:
> I looked at the code and when the height is on you have to take a 500k 
> compressed image, decompress it and make another copy of it 
> transformed.     This is a very memory intensive operation.  When you 
> don't put the height parameter on it you can just stream it off of the 
> disk a byte at a time and this works fine.
>
> Regards,
>
> 	Justin
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
> Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
> by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
> Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
> _______________________________________________
> Ginp-developers mailing list
> Gin...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ginp-developers