Re: [Ginp-developers] Version 0.2 is released

[Justin <ju...@sq...>]

Doug,

	Split the distribution into a src and war distribution but don't make=20
people have to download both the war and the lib to run ginp.

	We want to go for the simplest possible install.  It's ok to make=20
developers and those who want to build it themselves do a little more=20
work.  However, regular users, who may not even know Java, who just want=20
to download it and get the app to work should just be given a single=20
bundled war to download so that they can copy ginp.war into the war dir=20
and have it work without having to be aware of classpaths, etc.  8 megs=20
is not a lot these days.  I think that we are done growing for a while=20
unless we add a db persistance layer.

	I fixed the '+' encoding bug... the right way. I strongly recommend we=20
do a 0.21 release before people hand out lots of permalinks using your=20
custom encoding.

	Glad to hear that we have a user!  Remember, we have to think that=20
people are going to download ginp and expect to be able to figure out=20
how it works in 15 minutes or they are going to dump it and go onto the=20
next project.  We need to make all this work as simply as possible!

Cheers,

	Justin


Doug Culnane wrote:
> Dear Justin,
>=20
> The file version 0.2  is released.  It is huge and I think I need to=20
> split the releases into war src and lib.  Or have some other system... =
=20
> Got any ideas?
>=20
> I fixed the + char file name bug.  It is not very elegant but it works=20
> and should be robust.  If other chars cause problems we can add then to=
=20
> the StringTool function.  I can get the German chars to work the=20
> "=E4=F6=FC=C4=D6=DC=DF" I do not know why but non ASCII chars are a pro=
blem.
>=20
> I moved the resource Bundles because it is now easier to merge src=20
> trees.  Hope this is OK.
>=20
> We have a user!
>  From the web stats of the ginp site I found a link from this site:
> http://www.jimmynails.com/
>=20
>=20
> All the best,
>=20
> Doug
>=20