From: Charles Briscoe-S. <cp...@de...> - 2000-05-20 01:35:13
|
On Fri, May 19, 2000 at 08:37:20AM +0900, sh...@al... wrote: > > If it's optional, it would probably be OK. I suppose Debian has > > a stricter idea of stability than most... > > You can say that again. Too much so for my taste. Stable -> Stale. OTOH, a stable Debian release is closer to being bug-free than anything else I've seen. Testing takes time. > Luckily, no one forces me to run the current "stable" release. Agreed. ;) > > I think Eric's work is on a gimp-printified ghostscript package; mine > > is on a gimp plugin package. So the two should be complementary. > > Yes, althought the two should probably suggest each other. Certainly they should mention one another in their extended descriptions, but is either one useful if you've already installed the other? Maybe so: you'd want the gimp plugin version for extra control when printing photos, and the gs version for getting decent output from abiword and the like. But I'd still think twice before having them suggest each other. -- Charles Briscoe-Smith <URL:http://www.debian.org/%7Ecpbs/> PGP2: 1024/B35EE811 74 68 AB 2E 1C 60 22 94 B8 21 2D 01 DE 66 13 E2 "You think that's air you're breathing now?" -- Morpheus, "The Matrix" |