From: Robert L K. <rl...@al...> - 2000-05-08 02:22:59
|
From: sh...@al... Date: Sun, 07 May 2000 21:32:04 -0400 Since this string does appear in the Windows driver ouptut, it seems that the Epson engineers felt the need to include it in every print job rather than having it sent as Windows configures its USB devices at boot/insertion. They apparently didn't think it was such a bad thing to do. I'm inclined to agree. It's just a few bytes and it guarentees that the device will work. I don't know why the printer has the behavior of not listening to jobs from the USB port without that string anyway. Well, there's no real harm in taking the belt and suspenders approach. I agree that sending this string with the print job is somewhat lame, but it's also safe, and doesn't require the user to know about this hack. The more stuff the user has to configure, the more likely that things will go wrong. Sending the init string with the print job is apparently foolproof. And why would you want two different queues going to the same printer? As a really ugly hack, to have two computers share one printer without setting up a proper lpd configuration. No, I don't want to think about the implications of this. It's too ugly. |