From: Ron v. O. <R.A...@Wb...> - 2000-05-06 13:54:21
|
Robert L Krawitz wrote: > > Date: Sat, 06 May 2000 15:47:24 +0200 > From: Ron van Ostayen <R.A...@Wb...> > > time gs -q -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH -sDEVICE=stp -dModel=13 \ > -dQuality=0 -sOutputFile=tiger0.prn tiger.ps > > default: 28s > using inlined functions print_color, update_dither, calc_rgb_to_hsv and > calc_hsv_to_rgb: 21.5s. > > Other quality settings have different differences but the speedup is > there. > Perhaps you use a different gcc and processor? > > gcc version 2.95.2 19991024 (release) > > I'm using a Celeron at 450 MHz (4.5*100). Faster, but smaller, > cache. Also, I'm using 2.7.2.3. > > I presume you've recompiled with NO profiling. Yep. > > -- > Robert Krawitz <rl...@al...> http://www.tiac.net/users/rlk/ > > Tall Clubs International -- http://www.tall.org/ or 1-888-IM-TALL-2 > Member of the League for Programming Freedom -- mail lp...@uu... > Project lead for The Gimp Print -- http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net > > "Linux doesn't dictate how I work, I dictate how Linux works." > --Eric Crampton -- Ron van Ostayen R.A...@Wb... Laboratory of Tribology Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Technology Delft |