From: Robert L K. <rl...@al...> - 2000-05-06 13:53:09
|
Date: Sat, 06 May 2000 15:47:24 +0200 From: Ron van Ostayen <R.A...@Wb...> time gs -q -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH -sDEVICE=stp -dModel=13 \ -dQuality=0 -sOutputFile=tiger0.prn tiger.ps default: 28s using inlined functions print_color, update_dither, calc_rgb_to_hsv and calc_hsv_to_rgb: 21.5s. Other quality settings have different differences but the speedup is there. Perhaps you use a different gcc and processor? gcc version 2.95.2 19991024 (release) I'm using a Celeron at 450 MHz (4.5*100). Faster, but smaller, cache. Also, I'm using 2.7.2.3. I presume you've recompiled with NO profiling. -- Robert Krawitz <rl...@al...> http://www.tiac.net/users/rlk/ Tall Clubs International -- http://www.tall.org/ or 1-888-IM-TALL-2 Member of the League for Programming Freedom -- mail lp...@uu... Project lead for The Gimp Print -- http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net "Linux doesn't dictate how I work, I dictate how Linux works." --Eric Crampton |