Re: [Gimp-print-devel] 3.2 or 4.0 Release criteria

[Robert L K. <rl...@al...>]

   Date: Wed, 03 May 2000 21:29:22 +0200
   From: Thomas Tonino <tt...@bi...>

   >    > 4) Documentation.
   > 
   >    For the user? In the UI mostly.
   > 
   > That's what I meant about a help system.

   I meant things like 'Highest Quality 1440x720' instead of '1440x720 -
   may not work
   on some models'

The print plugin itself protects against that particular class of
problem; the Ghostscript driver should, but it needs some
infrastructure work to make it happen.

   I have scanned my printouts again.

   They can now be found at:

   http://people.a2000.nl/ztonino/dither/files/1440EnhancedRandomFS.jpg
   The magenta smear is a scanner problem. There is a little hint of the
   shadow near the hairline. It is visible with teh bare eye as well.

   http://people.a2000.nl/ztonino/dither/files/1440HQRandomFS.jpg
   http://people.a2000.nl/ztonino/dither/files/2880x720RandomFS.jpg
   http://people.a2000.nl/ztonino/dither/files/720SoftweaveRandomFS.jpg

OK, I'm confused.  I don't see any artifacts at all when I print it
(either as an EX or as a 600; of course, the EX printout is smoother),
and I'm not sure what artifacts you're referering to.  The missing
magenta and cyan seems to have entirely gone away.  The EX printout is
a bit reddish, but that's about it.  For that matter, I'm not sure
what artifacts you're referring to on your jpegs, either.

-- 
Robert Krawitz <rl...@al...>      http://www.tiac.net/users/rlk/

Tall Clubs International  --  http://www.tall.org/ or 1-888-IM-TALL-2
Member of the League for Programming Freedom -- mail lp...@uu...
Project lead for The Gimp Print --  http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net

"Linux doesn't dictate how I work, I dictate how Linux works."
--Eric Crampton