From: David R. <d_...@nc...> - 2000-04-01 17:38:13
|
Robert L Krawitz wrote: > > > Hmm. That's interesting. How is the 720? Is that correct? > Actually, gimp-print's 720dpi microweave mode is very fast, on par with the print speed in Windows. The only difference is in the print quality, with Windows a little better in graininess and patterning and gimp-print a little better in tonality and contrast. > http://www.nccn.net/~w_rosky/dsr/e720.prn.gz > http://www.nccn.net/~w_rosky/dsr/e1440.prn.gz > > Thanks! > I should make one note on the files: The driver is the one that shipped with the printer when I bought it around two years ago. The driver has been updated several times since then by Epson but I haven't bothered to update it since I've not had any problems with it. To help with the gimp-print development, however, I'll download the newest version of the driver and generate new print files just in case there's been any change in the formatting of the data. > > That happens on my EX, also. Does it happen differently with the > plugin vs. Windows? Yes, the page does not back up any visble amount with the gimp-print plugin. It's hard to tell how much it's backing up with the windows driver because the reverse feed is immediately followed by a page advance, but it seems to be around 1/4 inch or so which would be about what is required to get the plugin's image up to the top of the page. -David |