From: Robert L K. <rl...@al...> - 2000-03-30 00:10:41
|
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 08:47:45 -0800 From: David Rosky <dav...@ts...> I wasn't familiar with PDQ, so I looked up its web page. It seems like a nice system and I think I'll try it out. With respect to gimp-print, since PDQ uses Ghostscript to render postscript, and since gimp-print has a Ghostscript driver manifestation, wouldn't the two already be able to work together? Presumably, gimp-print could receive printer-specific options from PDQ in the form of Ghostscript command line options. ?? Yes. I've written pdq descriptions; they're in Ghost/gs-stp.pdq. > That's a limitation of the driver in its current form. I think I know > how to get rid of that, although it will make for a bit more banding > at the top, but it's going to be a fair bit of work to do. It's > definitely something I want to fix before 3.2. It actually might be > possible to get even closer than that, but let's do first things > first. I agree, it's not a big limitation at this point and functionality comes first. OK. |