From: Robert L K. <rl...@al...> - 2000-03-21 00:55:58
|
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2000 19:07:01 +0100 From: Thomas Tonino <tt...@bi...> It might be worthwhile to try the few matrices that are on my website ( http://people.a2000.nl/ztonino/dither/files/64C for example) as the randomizing data in the FS process. It is bound to be less visible than true random noise. If the patent problems are too complicated for a production environment, I'm willing to spend a day or more on an "artistically created" equivalent. The good thing about void-and-cluster generated random data is that it is of higher frequency than normal random data: blue noise as opposed to white noise. The current dither code isn't general enough to be able to handle arbitrary matrices. It's probably worth generalizing it some time. Right now it uses an adaptive matrix (or what I call an adaptive matrix, at any rate :-) ). |