From: <sh...@al...> - 2000-03-06 14:31:51
|
> Hi gimp print people, Hi. > I've done quite a bit of work over the years on > screening algorithms. I'm trying to push some of > them for commercial licensing, see > http://www.artofcode.com/eventone/ for details. As a copyright holder, you can license your code under many as many different licenses as you like. Commercial, closed source licensing is not precluded by releasing code under an Open Source license. > To this end, I've been building a testbed that > includes RGB->CMYK conversion and actual device > driving. Thus, this work duplicates driver work in > both GhostScript and gimp-print. So far, I have > drivers for Epson Stylus Color Pro and Stylus > Color 600. Why should a dithering algorithm be device specific? > I want to do the right thing in terms of > releasing this code as open source, but I'm moving > cautiously on that right now. If you'd like to discuss legal implications, we can certainly do that. I'm not a lawyer, but, I've seen one on TV. > There are a number > of companies who have stated that they're working > on improving print quality (the VA - HP alliance > and Corel come to mind), and I'd like to see if > they can fund the project. Probably the best way to impress VA/Corel is to release the code. The code becomes your resume. > In the meantime, I want to keep you guys in the > loop. I am happy to give you guys the code to play > around with, with the understanding that it is not > yet free software Thanks. I can't speak for the group, but, I'd rather not see the code until it's free. If, for any reason, the code never becomes free, there's always the possibility that we could be influenced by ideas in the code. It's probably better for us not to see it at all. Eric |